Token Lab検索

← Learning lab
RESEARCH / DERIVE · IMPLEMENT · VERIFY

実験で検証する研究の基礎。

六つの深い実験で、目的関数の導出、実装検証、失敗の分析、研究の説明を学びます。

01

勾配デバッガー

Check gradients numerically, inject a reduction bug, and distinguish instability from a wrong derivative.

↗
02

情報理論ラボ

Understand entropy, cross-entropy, both KL directions and support mismatch.

↗
03

LoRA ランク実験

Train low-rank factors, compare an analytical capacity bound, and inspect initialization failure.

↗
04

実験設計ラボ

Analyze paired run means, uncertainty and a predeclared practical improvement threshold.

↗
05

対照学習ラボ

Inspect InfoNCE, temperature and the exact gradient applied to a possible false negative.

↗
06

論文再現ワークベンチ

Record a falsifiable hypothesis, inspect controls and export a reviewable experiment report.

↗

Core paper reading library · 17

Read for a research question, not just a collection of links. These are official abstract and PDF links; reading guidance is our editorial learning path.

PDF links checked 2026-10-25. Unversioned arXiv URLs resolve to the current revision; record an explicit version for a reproducible study.

Browse papers by topic →

arXiv:1412.6980 · 2014

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

Kingma & Ba · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Algorithm 1; moment estimates and bias correction.

Reading checkpoint: Explain why zero-initialized moments need correction. The gradient debugger uses SGD, not Adam.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv14126980,
  title = {Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization},
  year = {2014},
  eprint = {1412.6980},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980}
}

arXiv:1711.05101 · 2017

Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization

Loshchilov & Hutter · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Comparison of L2 regularization and decoupled decay under adaptive updates.

Reading checkpoint: Write the two updates side by side; identify where the preconditioner acts. This is a reading extension, not an implemented AdamW benchmark.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv171105101,
  title = {Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization},
  year = {2017},
  eprint = {1711.05101},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101}
}

arXiv:1706.04599 · 2017

On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks

Guo et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Reliability diagrams, calibration metrics, temperature scaling.

Reading checkpoint: Distinguish class ranking from confidence quality; fit temperature on validation data, never the final test set.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv170604599,
  title = {On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks},
  year = {2017},
  eprint = {1706.04599},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04599}
}

arXiv:2106.09685 · 2021

LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models

Hu et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Low-rank parameterization, initialization and rank investigations.

Reading checkpoint: Derive parameter count and the first update when B=0; distinguish the toy matrix experiment from language-model fine-tuning.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv210609685,
  title = {LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models},
  year = {2021},
  eprint = {2106.09685},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685}
}

arXiv:2305.14314 · 2023

QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs

Dettmers et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Frozen quantized backbone, NF4, double quantization and paged optimizers.

Reading checkpoint: Make separate memory accounts for weights, adapters, optimizer states and activations. The site does not execute QLoRA.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv230514314,
  title = {QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs},
  year = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.14314},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14314}
}

arXiv:1807.03748 · 2018

Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding

van den Oord, Li & Vinyals · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Section 2.3: InfoNCE; Appendix A.1: mutual-information argument.

Reading checkpoint: Track the negative-sampling assumptions before interpreting a mutual-information bound.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv180703748,
  title = {Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding},
  year = {2018},
  eprint = {1807.03748},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03748}
}

arXiv:2002.05709 · 2020

A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations

Chen et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Framework, augmentation ablations, projection head and contrastive objective.

Reading checkpoint: List which augmentation invariances are useful or harmful for your domain. A lower training loss is not the only evaluation.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv200205709,
  title = {A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations},
  year = {2020},
  eprint = {2002.05709},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05709}
}

arXiv:1709.06560 · 2017

Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matters

Henderson et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Sources of experimental variability and reporting recommendations.

Reading checkpoint: Separate randomness from implementation and tuning differences. RL findings motivate controls; do not blindly transfer its numerical results to LLMs.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv170906560,
  title = {Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matters},
  year = {2017},
  eprint = {1709.06560},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06560}
}

arXiv:1909.03004 · 2019

Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results

Dodge et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Expected validation performance under a computational budget; model selection.

Reading checkpoint: Report search space, trial count and selection rule alongside the final score.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv190903004,
  title = {Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results},
  year = {2019},
  eprint = {1909.03004},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03004}
}

arXiv:2305.18290 · 2023

Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model

Rafailov et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: KL-constrained reward objective, policy reparameterization and preference loss.

Reading checkpoint: Identify the reference-policy log ratio and β. The current information lab teaches KL, not a DPO trainer.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv230518290,
  title = {Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model},
  year = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.18290},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290}
}

arXiv:1706.03762 · 2017

Attention Is All You Need

Vaswani et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Scaled dot-product attention, masking, multi-head attention and positional encodings.

Reading checkpoint: Derive dimensions and masking before interpreting the attention heatmap.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv170603762,
  title = {Attention Is All You Need},
  year = {2017},
  eprint = {1706.03762},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762}
}

arXiv:2205.14135 · 2022

FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness

Dao et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Tiling, online softmax, recomputation and IO complexity.

Reading checkpoint: Explain why reducing HBM traffic can accelerate exact attention; the browser does not benchmark GPU kernels.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv220514135,
  title = {FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness},
  year = {2022},
  eprint = {2205.14135},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14135}
}

arXiv:2210.03629 · 2022

ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models

Yao et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Interleaved reasoning/action trajectories and comparisons with alternative prompting.

Reading checkpoint: Compare agent success under matched tool access and action budgets. Mock tool traces are not evidence about an LLM policy.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv221003629,
  title = {ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models},
  year = {2022},
  eprint = {2210.03629},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629}
}

arXiv:2306.05685 · 2023

Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena

Zheng et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Judge biases, agreement with humans and benchmark construction.

Reading checkpoint: Use order-swapped comparisons and label audits; consistency alone does not establish correctness.

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv230605685,
  title = {Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena},
  year = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.05685},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05685}
}

arXiv:1707.06347 · 2017

Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

Schulman et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Read the method, experimental protocol and limitations together.

Reading checkpoint: Which controlled experiment could falsify the capability claim?

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv170706347,
  title = {Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms},
  year = {2017},
  eprint = {1707.06347},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347}
}

arXiv:2203.02155 · 2022

Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback

Ouyang et al. · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Read the method, experimental protocol and limitations together.

Reading checkpoint: Which controlled experiment could falsify the capability claim?

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv220302155,
  title = {Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback},
  year = {2022},
  eprint = {2203.02155},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155}
}

arXiv:2501.12948 · 2025

DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

DeepSeek-AI · Year denotes first arXiv submission

Read: Read the method, experimental protocol and limitations together.

Reading checkpoint: Which controlled experiment could falsify the capability claim?

BibTeX
@misc{arxiv250112948,
  title = {DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning},
  year = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.12948},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12948v1}
}

ローカル計算と合成データです。有料 API や実モデルのベンチマークは使用しません。

技術本文は英語と中国語に対応しています。この言語では英語の技術本文を表示します。